Yesterday, we noted that Judge Nathan had dismissed a state law unfair competition claim brought against Aereo, an online television service, on the grounds that it was preempted by the Copyright Act. Today, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Public Knowledge moved for permission to file an amicus brief on behalf of Aereo to counter the surviving claims against Aereo under the Copyright Act itself. In the amicus brief attached to the motion, the EFF and PK argue that Aereo’s business is protected by Cartoon Network LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc., 536 F.3d 121 (2d Cir. 2008), which held that “the transmission of a copyrighted work is a private performance outside the exclusive rights of the copyright owner when it is one-to-one, that is, made to a single individual or family and social acquaintances.” Here, the amici argue that the transmittal of broadcast television over the internet is no different from recording live TV on a VCR or DVR and watching it (among friends or alone) at a later time.
Recent Blog Posts
Judge Abrams: Boxer Entitled to Injunction Over Heavyweight Title Rematch Judge Pauley Orders Sprint and Regulator to Provide Details on Proposed Settlement NYT: SDNY Judges Call One Another For Input on Hard Issues Judge Scheindlin Certifies Injunction Class in Antitrust Challenge to “Territorial” Structure of Sports Broadcasts After Bench Trial, Judge Cote Rules For FHFA in Case Against Nomura, RBS Judge Román, Disagreeing With Eighth Circuit, Rules Suit Over “Organic” Label Not Preempted Second Circuit Declares NSA’s Bulk Phone Data Collection Unlawful Judge Forrest: “Flash Boys” Suit Against Exchanges is Preempted by Federal Law Judge Scheindlin Allows Class Action Over Barclays “Dark Pool” to Proceed NYT: Figure Skating “Energizes” Judge Sweet for Court