Yesterday, we noted that Judge Nathan had dismissed a state law unfair competition claim brought against Aereo, an online television service, on the grounds that it was preempted by the Copyright Act. Today, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Public Knowledge moved for permission to file an amicus brief on behalf of Aereo to counter the surviving claims against Aereo under the Copyright Act itself. In the amicus brief attached to the motion, the EFF and PK argue that Aereo’s business is protected by Cartoon Network LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc., 536 F.3d 121 (2d Cir. 2008), which held that “the transmission of a copyrighted work is a private performance outside the exclusive rights of the copyright owner when it is one-to-one, that is, made to a single individual or family and social acquaintances.” Here, the amici argue that the transmittal of broadcast television over the internet is no different from recording live TV on a VCR or DVR and watching it (among friends or alone) at a later time.
Recent Blog Posts
Judge Francis: Parties Must Move for a Protective Order, Not Merely Object, to Overly Broad 30(b)(6) Notice Lululemon Calls “See-Through” Yoga Pants a “Painful Misstep,” Not Fraud Judge Cote Sanctions Class Action Law Firm for Unsupported Allegations Against AOL Judge Cote Agrees With Apple That Antitrust Monitor Should Not Speak Ex Parte With Court Judge Maas Rejects Request to Depose SEC Officials to Prove Madoff’s Elusiveness Apple Seeks to Limit Power and Pay of Antitrust Monitor American Idol Moves to Dismiss Discrimination Suit on First Amendment Grounds Judge Oekten Dismisses SEC Insider Trading Complaint Containing “All Belief and No Information” Judge Gardephe Orders Gibson Dunn to Produce Notes of Interviews of Witnesses Whose Statements It Revealed to SEC Justice Alito Criticizes Judge Baer’s Practice of Seeking Diversity for Class Counsel Google Wins Summary Judgment in Authors’ Case Against Google Books Second Circuit Denies Judge Scheindlin Intervention in Stop-and-Frisk Case and Explains Grounds for Her Removal Judge Marrero Emphatically Rejects Group of Motions Disclaiming Liability for MF Global Collapse NYC Moves to Vacate Stop-and-Frisk Rulings; Argues That Judge Scheindlin Improperly Deemed New Case “Related” to Closed One MLB Moves to Dismiss A-Rod Suit; A-Rod Moves to Remand Judge Furman Rules That New York City’s Emergency Planning Violates Disability Laws; Orders Parties to Confer on Remedy